Daniel Ricciardo, RB, Shanghai International Circuit, 2024

Chinese GP penalty spree puts F1 drivers at greater risk of race bans in 2024

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Formula 1 drivers are at a greater risk of incurring race bans as stewards are issuing far more penalty points in 2024 compared to last year.

Stewards handed out just two penalty points over the first five races of last year. They issued 18 over the same period this season, a nine-fold increase.

The majority of those came at last weekend’s Chinese Grand Prix. Five drivers received penalties which put a total of 11 penalty points on their licence. Any driver who collects 12 penalty points over a 12-month period received an automatic one-race ban.

The majority of the penalty points have been issued for incidents in which one driver collided with another. The FIA stewards are enforcing new guidelines this year which have toughened up their enforcement of the rules. This came partly in response to drivers pointing out that the five-second time penalties issued for some infringements were often too lenient.

Logan Sargeant, Williams, Shanghai International Circuit, 2024
Safety Car infringement left Sargeant on eight penalty points
The spate of penalties issued in recent races has left several drivers worryingly close to a ban. Logan Sargeant, one of those penalised last weekend, is now on eight penalty points. If he collects four more between now and the Italian Grand Prix in September – 11 rounds including two more sprint races – he will receive an automatic penalty.

Sergio Perez is in an even more perilous position having reached eight penalty points at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix. He won’t have any points deducted from his licence for another 12 rounds.

The driver who has felt the wrath of the stewards most keenly this year is Fernando Alonso. In the space of three rounds he has gone from having a clean licence to halfway towards a ban, due to a pair of three-point sanctions.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

The first was his hotly-debated penalty for slowing abruptly in front of George Russell on the penultimate lap in Australia, leading to the Mercedes driver’s crash. The second came in last weekend’s sprint race where he tangled with Carlos Sainz Jnr as he attempted to re-pass the Ferrari driver in turn nine.

Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin, Shanghai International Circuit, 2024
Alonso disagreed with penalty for Sainz clash
“Obviously, I [do] not agree,” said Alonso when asked about his latest penalty, “but they have all the power to do what they think is is right and we have to accept it and move on.”

But he and other drivers nearing the 12-point limit will have to keep in mind the stewards’ resolve to clamp down on incidents in races whenever they find themselves in a wheel-to-wheel battle.

No F1 driver has ever been banned for reaching this limit. However it has happened in other categories which have the same rules. Two Formula 2 drivers collected bans this way during 2022 and another did in 2019.

The closest any F1 driver has come to receiving a ban in this way is Pierre Gasly, who reached 10 points at the end of 2022. He avoided collecting any penalty points for his collision with team mate Esteban Ocon at Melbourne last year, at which time he was two points away from a ban, and by today’s standards would surely have been in much more trouble.

Drivers who have collected penalty points in 2024

DriverEventSessionInfringementPenaltyPenalty points
Sergio PerezSaudi ArabiaGrand prixUnsafe release5 second time penalty1
Kevin MagnussenSaudi ArabiaGrand prixCollision with Alexander Albon10 second time penalty3
Fernando AlonsoAustraliaGrand prixCausing an incidentDrive-through penalty3
Fernando AlonsoChinaSprint raceCausing an incident with Carlos Sainz Jnr10 second time penalty3
Kevin MagnussenChinaGrand prixCollision with Yuki Tsunoda10 second time penalty2
Lance StrollChinaGrand prixCollision with Daniel Ricciardo10 second time penalty2
Logan SargeantChinaGrand prixOvertook Nico Hulkenberg under Safety Car conditions10 second time penalty2
Daniel RicciardoChinaGrand prixOvertook Nico Hulkenberg under Safety Car conditionsGrid drop: 3 places2

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

2024 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2024 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Author information

Keith Collantine
Lifelong motor sport fan Keith set up RaceFans in 2005 - when it was originally called F1 Fanatic. Having previously worked as a motoring...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

27 comments on “Chinese GP penalty spree puts F1 drivers at greater risk of race bans in 2024”

  1. Magnussen en Stroll both took out a RB and got the same penalty as Sargeant who was a few cm short at the pit-exit line. No one could see that difference and due to him pitting a lap later, he couldn’t give the position back. That should have been handled differently.

    1. Since it’s not possible to know who was first to the line here, they should just order them back to where they should be. For George Russell they can install a television so he can review the instant replay while fiddling with the steering wheel!

    2. Señor Sjon An Sionnach
      I agree regarding Sargeant’s case that since he couldn’t have voluntarily given the position back due to limited visibility with his precise SC2 line positioning relative to Hulkenberg, race control should’ve simply ordered him, or the team informed him.

    3. It is a travesty. Imagine if it happened to a driver that actually mattered.

  2. Alonso’s latest penalty is not from the same planet as the one where George’s lunge into the chicane on Piastri in Suzuka is not a penalty!

    1. Once again showing the double standard Alonso has always been held to.

  3. I still wouldn’t give importance to penalty points until a race ban due to them is actually issued, in fact I like the massive amount of points they’re dishing out because if they end up with 4 drivers on 11 points and all 4 get involved in some incident and suddenly no penalty for anyone it’ll make a mockery of the penalty system: exposure is sometimes needed to get changes.

    1. @esploratore1 I mostly agree, but just wait until a steward with a vendetta against a particular driver gets an opportunity to dish out the race banning points and you can be sure they’ll be doing everything they can to get those points issued.

      1. Like Johnny Herbert did to Alonso at Australia? A guy who has bad blood with the guy and even blamed Alonso for upsetting his wife.

        1. Nick T, what Herbert said was that, following the incident where Alonso shouted insults at him after a race, he simply brushed Alonso’s complaints off, but made an aside comment where he said that his wife thought that Alonso was behaving rudely.

          What he therefore actually said was milder than what you claim he said, and your post comes across as exaggerating what he said in order to demonise him more aggressively.

    2. Yeah, as the Gasly episode showed, they’ll just stop giving points to prevent a ban.

      Until proven otherwise, these are meaningless.

      1. MichaelN I doubt the lack of penalty points for the Ocon collision was actually to avoid him getting a race ban.
        Probably just the hectic overall situation impacted decision-making.

        1. It wasn’t just that, he also escaped a bunch of points also at the end of 2022.

          They were also happy to give Sainz a penalty there in Australia, despite there being two other more serious incidents in the same restart. What helped Gasly in that race was probably that the stewards tend to ignore intra-team incidents, for which there isn’t any justification in the rules, but hey, what can you do.

      2. It was comical how obviously they were in avoiding giving a suspension to Gasly.

  4. Had Alonso had 11 points on his license, they’d have never given him 3 for that teeny tiny contact with Sainz. They’d have given him a grid penalty and that’s it.

    It’s unbelievable that Logan got 2 penalty points for that incident, just as many as Magnussen and Lance, who also SHOULDN’T have been given penalty points. Sporting penalties are enough for that kind of stuff (grid positions, time penalties, whatever).

    The fact that a driver could be forced to miss a grand prix because of a series of clashes while battling other cars (like the one with Alonso vs Sainz) is mind blowing.

    1. RandomMallard
      22nd April 2024, 14:51

      @fer-no65 I’d argue that running into the back of another car, with plenty of warning, while still (sort of) under Safety Car conditions is absolutely worth penalty points. In fact, I though 2 points was relatively lenient for such a silly and irresponsible move.

      1. Agreed: running into the back of the car in front when you *aren’t* trying to overtake but are just trying to get round the corner safely, is exactly where penalty points are justified.

        See Stroll, Magnussen

    2. if vowels didn’t appeal that penalty he should be fired.

  5. Penalty Points were once introduced to prevent dangerous driving.

    Now it’s just a thing they do for each and every dumb thing. Who was endangered by Sargeant pit line error? Nobody, but here we are.

    1. Penalty points were introduced to ensure that repeated minor infringements had some consequence. The “dangerous driving” stuff was made up years later when some drivers started to run the risk of race bans because they couldn’t stay within track limits.

      1. How is going over track limits on a qualifying lap “bad behaviour” that needs more penalty than invalidating the lap, exactly?

        How is Sargeant’s “infraction” of being a few cm’s behind at a white line that he couldn’t see from his cockpit “bad behaviour?”

      2. Penalty points system was created because of Grosjean. In theory, it should be a deterrent for reckless driving. But IMO most collisions happen because of a human error, i.e, driver misjudging their braking point or space around the car. You can’t increase spatial awareness with penalties, nor you can erase human errors with penalties. On the contrary, for example, if you’re playing electric shock maze, the harsher the penalty, the more likely you are to goof up.

        Unless you crash on purpose, I don’t think driver should be penalized. Collisions and contacts are integral part of motorsport. It’s ridiculous to even want to eliminate them. People love Senna-Prost type of clashes. That’s also the reason why no one will watch AI racing, because it’s going to be utterly boring without human errors.

    2. As @red-andy notes, it was meant to be a penalty for repeated bad behaviour, which is something that cannot be penalized in any other way as other penalties are tied to specific incidents.

      That drivers tried to pretend they were unfairly penalized for ‘minor’ incidents doesn’t make it true (they will always complain about everything). And in any case, not being in control of their car so frequently that the penalty points for track limit infringements become an issue is a pretty worrying state of affairs that probably does require a time out and a rethinking of their approach.

  6. How is a 3 place grid drop equivalent to a 10 second time penalty? Sigh.

  7. Can a team field two cars in a GP if a driver is banned?

  8. How is Stroll not at the top of this list?

  9. I have a contrarian view. I think stewards are going to be harsh and won’t even mind a race ban. In fact, even Liberty will be for it. Think o fit this way, the only real big story of this season has been the Bearman debut and the consequent fairy-tale Sainz win. Both of them occurred because a regular driver had to be benched.

    Imagine if there are a few more debutants like this through the year. Liberty would love it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.