Max Verstappen, Red Bull, Miami International Autodrome, 2024

Verstappen takes sprint race pole despite error as Leclerc recovers for second

Formula 1

Posted on

| Written by

Max Verstappen secured pole position for the Miami sprint race ahead of Charles Leclerc despite a mistake on his final flying lap.

The championship leader had to catch his car with a snap of oversteer through the turns 14 and 15 chicane but still managed to take pole by a tenth from the Ferrari driver.

Sergio Perez will start third in Saturday’s sprint race, with Daniel Ricciardo fourth for RB.

SQ1

The first phase of sprint qualifying began with the track in picture perfect conditions with track temperature in the mid-forties.

Having completed only two laps in practice before spinning out, Charles Leclerc had to try and make up for lost time and get up to speed quickly in his Ferrari. Leclerc, like all drivers, had to head out on medium tyres as per the limits for the first section of qualifying.

Max Verstappenset the early pace for Red Bull, but the two upgraded McLarens of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri set the quickest times to lead the field. That was only after Piastri narrowly avoided contact with Valtteri Bottas at turn one when the Sauber appeared unaware that the McLaren was approaching – an incident the stewards will investigate after the session.

In the closing minutes, Daniel Ricciardo managed to improve and get himself out of the drop zone, pushing Pierre Gasly into danger. The Alpine driver could not find the time needed to reach safety and he was eliminated in 16th.

The two Saubers of Zhou Guanyu and Bottas were also knocked out, with the two Williams of Logan Sargeant and Alexander Albon, who had his quickest time deleted by the stewards for exceeding track limits, dropping him out.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ1 result

P.#DriverTeamModelTimeGap
14Lando NorrisMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’27.939
281Oscar PiastriMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’28.0560.117
314Fernando AlonsoAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.1920.253
41Max VerstappenRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’28.1940.255
520Kevin MagnussenHaas-FerrariVF-241’28.3770.438
663George RussellMercedesW151’28.3870.448
755Carlos Sainz JnrFerrariSF-241’28.4350.496
816Charles LeclercFerrariSF-241’28.5370.598
911Sergio PerezRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’28.6810.742
1022Yuki TsunodaRB-Honda RBPT011’28.6870.748
113Daniel RicciardoRB-Honda RBPT011’28.7000.761
1244Lewis HamiltonMercedesW151’28.7360.797
1318Lance StrollAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.8070.868
1431Esteban OconAlpine-RenaultA5241’28.8730.934
1527Nico HulkenbergHaas-FerrariVF-241’29.0401.101
1610Pierre GaslyAlpine-RenaultA5241’29.1851.246
1724Zhou GuanyuSauber-FerrariC441’29.2671.328
1877Valtteri BottasSauber-FerrariC441’29.3601.421
192Logan SargeantWilliams-MercedesFW461’29.5511.612
2023Alexander AlbonWilliams-MercedesFW461’29.8581.919

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ2

Norris was quickest again after the majority of drivers completed their first runs of the second phase of sprint qualifying. Wielding the updated McLaren, Norris lapped two tenths of a second quicker than Sergio Perez in the Red Bull and Charles Leclerc in the Ferrari.

Drivers were starting to push their cars closer to the limit, as evident when Ricciardo brushed the wall under the bridge exiting turn 16 on his push lap. Lewis Hamilton also reported touching the same barrier.

Verstappen waited until the final minutes of the session to head out for a single run to secure passage to the final phase. He did so with the fourth-fastest time, four tenths behind Norris’s best.

After his touch with the wall, Hamilton was unable to find enough time to get himself into SQ3 and was out in 12th. Mercedes’ misery was complete when team mate George Russell missed out on the top ten by just 0.013 seconds.

Esteban Ocon was eliminated in 13th, ahead of Kevin Magnussen’s Haas. Yuki Tsunoda set a single flying lap but it was deleted for exceeding track limits at turn five, leaving him out in 15th while team mate Ricciardo progressed easily into the top ten in fifth.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ2 result

P.#DriverTeamModelTimeGap
14Lando NorrisMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’27.597
211Sergio PerezRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’27.8650.268
316Charles LeclercFerrariSF-241’27.9770.380
41Max VerstappenRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’28.0010.404
53Daniel RicciardoRB-Honda RBPT011’28.1220.525
681Oscar PiastriMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’28.1630.566
714Fernando AlonsoAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.1890.592
855Carlos Sainz JnrFerrariSF-241’28.2620.665
918Lance StrollAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.3230.726
1027Nico HulkenbergHaas-FerrariVF-241’28.3300.733
1163George RussellMercedesW151’28.3430.746
1244Lewis HamiltonMercedesW151’28.3710.774
1331Esteban OconAlpine-RenaultA5241’28.3790.782
1420Kevin MagnussenHaas-FerrariVF-241’28.6141.017
1522Yuki TsunodaRB-Honda RBPT011’28.7361.139

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ3

With the final segment of sprint qualifying lasting only eight minutes and all drivers finally permitted to run soft tyres, the entire field of 10 cars waited until under four minutes remained until finally leaving the pit lane.

When they did, Nico Hulkenberg was the first across the line to start his timed lap, which he did on well-used tyres. The Haas driver’s 1’28.476 was easily beaten by Perez’s 1’27.876, but despite a moment of oversteer through the chicane of turns 14 and 15, Verstappen managed to beat his team mate by two tenths to take provisional sprint pole.

Leclerc went quicker than Perez but could not beat Verstappen’s best time, moving into second place. Neither Carlos Sainz Jnr nor the two McLarens could come close to Verstappen’s pole time, leaving the championship leader on the top spot of the grid for Saturday morning’s sprint race.

Perez will start third with Ricciardo a surprise fourth for RB. Sainz took fifth for Ferrari, with Piastri in sixth ahead of the two Aston Martins of Lance Stroll and Fernando Alonso seventh and eighth, despite Stroll having tyres eight lap older than his team mate. Norris and Hulkenberg completed the top ten.

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

SQ3 result

P.#DriverTeamModelTimeGap
11Max VerstappenRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’27.641
216Charles LeclercFerrariSF-241’27.7490.108
311Sergio PerezRed Bull-Honda RBPTRB201’27.8760.235
43Daniel RicciardoRB-Honda RBPT011’28.0440.403
555Carlos Sainz JnrFerrariSF-241’28.1030.462
681Oscar PiastriMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’28.1610.520
718Lance StrollAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.3750.734
814Fernando AlonsoAston Martin-MercedesAMR241’28.4190.778
94Lando NorrisMcLaren-MercedesMCL381’28.4720.831
1027Nico HulkenbergHaas-FerrariVF-241’28.4760.835

2024 Miami Grand Prix

Browse all 2024 Miami Grand Prix articles

Author information

Will Wood
Will has been a RaceFans contributor since 2012 during which time he has covered F1 test sessions, launch events and interviewed drivers. He mainly...

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

45 comments on “Verstappen takes sprint race pole despite error as Leclerc recovers for second”

  1. So, when Ric doesn’t perform he’s washed and when he totally outperforms the car, it’s just a surprise…

    1. I’m surprised, aren’t your surprised?

      I’ll be wanting the 2024 sports almanac of the future from the one person that wasn’t surprised.

      1. I’m surprised, but I think he’s effort deserves more than a passing mention. Especially given the multiple articles that have been devoted to his lack of form.

        1. Yes, that’s a good performance, much like mexico last year or monza 2021, they’ve just been too rare, but on these rare events you see the ricciardo who drove for red bull back then.

          1. It’s also possible there really was something wrong with the other chassis. He started immediately doing well when given the new car. He was on for a points finish in China until Stroll smashed into him. When asked if she thinks there was an issue with the chassis or it was psychosomatic, Ruth Buscombe said she’s seen both. There have been times they did find major flaws in the construction and sometimes they found nothing. If he continues to perform like this or even close to it, I think it’d be fair to say let’s see him back in the RBR ASAP. However, we need to see at least five weekends in a row of him performing exceptionally before we get to the point we can consider his reform truly restored.

      2. Tristan I like your BTTF reference.

    2. So I guess Ricciardo got the good chassis this weekend?

      Does anyone know what parts Piastri didn’t have that Lando had?

    3. I still think he’s washed. Let’s wait for thr full weekend to end.

  2. Paul (@frankjaeger)
    3rd May 2024, 22:55

    That was wide open for Lando. Very disappointing. His lap on mediums in Q2 was good enough for pole.

    I read he couldn’t sort his tyres out – can anyone corroborate?

    1. An Sionnach
      3rd May 2024, 22:59

      Some of the Lando open goal moments over the last year or so… I don’t want to say it. Come on, Lando!

      1. The concerning thing for Lando is he was beaten by Oscar who had two-tenths worth of upgrades missing from his car. Lando has never been that great at nailing it on just one lap/one short run. The wet session last time out in China’s sprint quali benefitted him in that respect as he could do multiple laps. I suppose Verstappen and Red Bull showed the difference between a team and driver that is used to delivering consistently and a driver/team combo like Norris and McLaren that is learning the hard way about what is and isn’t required to become winners.

    2. Mistakes happen, he will be harder on himself than anyone judging by his previous comments.

      I hope he keeps his head up and the pressure off, at least it’s only for the sprint.

    3. Perhaps he would had performed better had he spent some more time in the simulator, rather than partying on a boat. I like Lando. He is really fast. But his inconsistency and errors on crucial moments is not improving.

    4. New nicknames: Lando Nervous (another “I should have been on the front row” quali), Lance Skrull (those times when it looks like another, better driver has stolen his body) and Melbourne Again or Australia’s new/old golden boy(we’ll have to see if DR delivers in the race and Piastri struggles per usual).

      1. Well “Alex” would sit well after his reprise complete with bloodied tape of MM’s role in A Clockwork Orange

  3. Mega result from Ricciardo! Let’s see if he can have a good start and keep it clean tomorrow.

    1. I just hope he doesn’t put it into the back of CL

  4. An Sionnach
    3rd May 2024, 22:57

    Ricciardo did well, but I was most impressed with Ruth Buscombe talk about the strategies with so much punch and energy. The whole F1TV team seemed giddy, which was a bit of fun. It’s a relief to be free from the awful Sky team.

    1. Yeah she was great! It was very fun listening to FP1.

    2. Who’d have thought it’d be great to have someone who actually knows what they’re talking about in the box? I also like the French guy (Kimi’s old race engineer) they have do the pit lane reporting every four or five races. Unlike Buxton’s blather, he actually tells us about stuff I never knew before and which will be relevant in terms of what to expect and interpreting results .

  5. The main reason for these strange lap times (strange fluctuation in lap times) and knife-edge performance characteristics in F1 is due to the garbage that Pirelli offers as top performance tires. It is very sad that F1 stuck with Pirelli.

    1. & limited time in each phase.

  6. Soft tyres don’t look good for this weekend it seems. Maybe Mercedes saving a set of medium tyres might not look too bad on them after all, even though they still believe Hamilton and Russell can extract crazy laptimes from their weird car. At this point, Toto is already going to get more blame on the performance.

  7. Chris Horton
    3rd May 2024, 23:18

    Superb result for Ricciardo. Really pleased for him.

  8. Another letdown by norris.

  9. Yes (@come-on-kubica)
    3rd May 2024, 23:34

    Ricciardo looks like he’s having another decent weekend. It was harsh after 3 races but he can overdeliver, Tsunoda can’t.

    1. Not another
      4th May 2024, 1:05

      Does anyone know what TSU’s deleted laptime was in SQ2?
      Probably not fully indicative but might provide a reference.

    2. Yes, however he really needs to get a result: other good quali he had ended with a bad start and a crash, he mustn’t get involved in incidents, I know stroll’s one wasn’t his fault, and get some points.

    3. Overdeliver? Rubbish, TSU overdelivered Abu Dhabi 2021, Brazil 2023, early 2023. TSU 8, RIC 5

  10. That was disappointing from Lando. I think he made some sort of mistake in S1 because if I remember correct he was like 8 tenths slower than Max on the first sector alone.

    1. He was indeed, verstappen had a .0 and he had a .8, on top of that how comes piastri beat him by 3 tenths with norris having the upgraded car? Clearly, even if mclaren is bad on soft tyres, there was more to give than 6th in q3.

  11. The Q3 with everybody doing just 1 lap was a joke.

    I watched the British Sky broadcast and they didnt even mention Ricciardo’s performance during the session.

    1. To be fair I wouldn’t be in a hurry to talk about the “veecarb” either, what an embarrassment of a name to be associated with. It doesn’t exist in any shape or form. Might aswell be called the goobitygoo or malarky.

      1. Hideous livery also.

        1. The livery is amazing. The name is cringe, but you can talk about a driver without saying “Visa Cash Grab RB.”

      2. I said I would just call it toro rosso and I do, back to original names since the new ones are so horrible!

        1. Yup, I solely refer to them as Toro Rosso. Even if you remove horrendous sponsor names, RB sounds confusing. You could be referring to RBR.

    2. Asd I agree & thus, maybe switching to the 2003-05 style single-lap format for sprint qualifying final phase would be a decent idea, after all.

    3. They love hating on Ricciardo and Alonso and saying as little as possible or ignoring it completely when they’ve done anything noteworthy. They’ll talk for hours about Russell though, how impressive and cool as a cucumber this kid Piastri is or why/how the best driver of all time is qualifying 18th (whether it’s because Mercedes made a mistake, he’s checked out and thinking about Ferrari, his car has an issue or Russell’s time at Williams has given him an advantage over Lewis in driving difficult cars). I’m happy they at least seem to mention the Hulk’s impressive performances for 45-60 seconds.

  12. Sargeant finally managed to out-qualify Albon & on merit, given Albon only managed to be faster by cheating.
    Stroll was also sprint qualifying’s positive surprise (& even out-qualify Alonso on merit) & even more so Ricciardo, who managed to beat not only AMs, Mclarens, & Mercs but even a Ferrari.
    One Mercedes failing to progress from Q2 is another thing, but both drivers simultaneously failing at that was somewhat surprising.
    What was Bottas doing, though? Even if a race engineer doesn’t warn in time, a driver should always avoid slow driving on the racing line as much as possible, so in this case, he should’ve switched to the right immediately after crossing the timing line to avoid all risks, but he didn’t bother, so totally on him.
    Perhaps having SQ3 like the entire qualifying format in 2003-05 wouldn’t be such a bad idea, after all, but only for sprint qualifying’s final phase.

    1. Yeah, that was a weak excuse by Bottas and while I understand his anger about his race engineer being replaced with zero warning, the complaint just made him look like he was both making an excuse and using the opportunity to be petty toward his new race engineer.

      Williams in general is just a huge let down this year. I have said it before and I’ll say it again, it seemed like a very bad idea to ditch a platform that was giving them good results, especially when Vowles knew or should have known it would be really hard to produce an all new chassis design in time for the season let alone have the capacity to test and update it with decent regularity. Now, it just seems like they have a car that is bad at everything instead of a car they knew would be highly competitive on high speed tracks and which was even coming good on twisty tracks like Zandvoort.

    2. Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
      4th May 2024, 10:22

      Stroll seems to be as good as alonso about half the time during the sprint qualifying/races over the this and the previous season. I feel alonso acts like he just couldn’t care less for them. Twice he’s made contact or an error and then retired during the race. And in others, his pace has looked more or less matched.

  13. Liked Max’s first comment on the radio: ‘lol’

    He knew he bungled his lap, others (notably Norris) just bungled it even worse. Still, Mclaren might actually be in with a shot of winning if their pace holds on raceday.

  14. Even if Q3 was a bit of a letdown with so many drivers failing to string together a great lap, the highlights were surprisingly good. Lots of clips from across all parts of the track, and a big uninterrupted chunk of the pole lap. Much, much better than the static S/F shot that plagues so many qualifying highlights.

Comments are closed.